Search for: "In Re TM"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2016, 2:53 am
The post 2(c) or Not to See Political TM Speech? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
A degree of consumer stupidity we’re not prepared to tolerate. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:34 am
Empiricists think they’re having an empirical debate, but they’re deeply normative. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Hard to get too far based just on equity.Hunter: not equity; why we’re ok w/merchandising right, which seems contrary to stated aims of TM law. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Trade dress: Congress relegated it to the Supplemental Register; In re Haig & Haig (Comm’r 1958) Daphne Robert said that she didn’t care what Congress said; 8th Circuit said it was protectable under §43(a) for trade dress of corn hopper. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
"Re Le Mans TM") the phrase would have capital initials by virtue of forming part of the title - "title case" is in fact the correct expression for that, I think. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
The Washington football team & In re Tam. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
See this in Qualitex and a bit in Wal-Mart—if we’re wrong about distinctiveness, producers will usually have discrete symbols they can use instead to identify source. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 2:10 am
Alleged uncanny similarities between Starbucks' new "local" brand extension, 15th Street Coffee & Tea, have gotten some play in TM-land. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:16 am
These quite varying anecdotes serve as a reminder that it isn’t just public and private companies that think and care about trademark enforcement—universities do too, even if they’re late to the party. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
Said: we’re not all on the same page on harm. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:30 pm
Meurer: L&E has had little influence over French or German TM law; they’re not better off than we are. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
We assume they’re equally serious across the board, but maybe not. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Instead, a moral sense that TM owners and not some third party deserve the results of their labor, absent some justification. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 4:54 am
See In re Pennington Seed, Inc., No. 06-1133 (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
They might not know they’re confused if they don’t have anything to complain about. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Assume you’re in-house at Delta Airlines. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
You're starting with some incorrect information; we need to back up a few steps.Square One Dept. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:23 am
East West argued that the introduction of new products bearing the mark in summer 2011 re-triggered the statute of limitations. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Title may seem surprising b/c Dogan advocated for TM use to distinguish b/t secondary and direct liability in TM law. [read post]
