Search for: "In Re Tarr" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2006, 4:59 am
In one field, TARR erroneously listed the publication date as October 31, 2006, while in another field, TARR listed the publication date as October 24, 2006. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by ipelton
While these have received a lot of attention, they also re-raise issues about protecting any phrases (such as “YOU’RE FIRED”). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:45 am by ipelton
State Farm recently announced a re-branding campaign including a new logo design. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:08 pm by Sonya Hubbard
(They’re joining the board at a fortuitous time, by the way. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
"When you're talking about a full-service hotel, particularly one with a lot of group meeting space, they're simply not financeable without some form of subsidy," he said. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:37 am
We're not sure which type of "objection" you're referring to but we're going to assume you want to respond to an examiner's Office Action refusing or rejecting your application. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by John L. Welch
CAFC Affirms TTAB Genericness Ruling re "MATTRESS.COM" for -- Guess What? [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:44 am
Lawyer: Yes, but I need to see what the letter says.Woman: You're e a lawyer. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:29 pm
We’re not exactly sure where to start, so we’ll just throw the question your way: Are there any potential legal issues confronting Sanford? [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
 If you're wondering why an application or trademark has been abandoned, you can do the detective work and find some evidence by checking the TARR status of the mark, or if necessary by reading through the documents you can access for free via the USPTO's TDR (Trademark Document Retrieval). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
If you're wondering why a trademark application has been abandoned, you can do the detective work and find the reasons by checking the TARR status of the mark, or if necessary by reading through the documents you can access for free via the USPTO's TDR (Trademark Document Retrieval). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:40 am by Steve Lubet
And so Webster re-doubled his effort to bolster this shaky evidence. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am by John L. Welch
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)Failure to Function:Precedential No. 8: Divided TTAB Panel Affirms Refusal to Register Chippendales' "Cuffs & Collar Mark"Precedential No. 4: TTAB Rules that a Sound Emitted by Goods in Normal Course of Operation Cannot Be Inherently DistinctiveFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No 42: TTAB Denies Fraud Summary… [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by ipelton
I asked about TSDR and the phase out of TARR. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:08 pm
The problem arose because Lindt had served the notice of opposition by mailing it to Applicant Flores' address, rather than to the "correspondence address of record" stated in the TARR database. [read post]