Search for: "In Re The Detention Of: S. B. Appellant"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Juvenile law — Illegal sentence — Non-community based detention These consolidated appeals arise from a decision by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, sitting as a juvenile court, to commit Devontaye S., appellant, to the custody of the Department of Juvenile Services (“DJS”) for a Level B, non-community based placement. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
Juvenile law — illegal sentence — Detention in out-of-state facility The appellant, A.B., was adjudicated delinquent at the age of thirteen by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, sitting as a juvenile court, on August 31, 2012, upon entering a plea of involved to two counts of attempted armed robbery. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:00 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court first agreed that Still’s re-initiating contact amounted to a second detention. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
s. 11(b), Delay, and the Sentencing PeriodThis article is one of two articles on the complexity and nuances of s. 11(b). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
s. 11(b), Delay, and the Sentencing PeriodThis article is one of two articles on the complexity and nuances of s. 11(b). [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:06 pm
In re Antonio B., 2008 Cal. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am
I am re-posting Attorney Bill Gallagher’s guest post on bail reform to include some additional information from him. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that… [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:42 am
§ 950j(b) without comment–leaving only the more general jurisdiction-stripping provision from the 2006 MCA, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Coop fédérée, 2019 QCCA 1678 (CanLII) [17] Le débat en appel, comme celui qui a donné lieu au jugement de première instance[4] (ci-après le « jugement entrepris »), porte sur la nature juridique du virement électronique de fonds et son incidence sur la couverture d’assurance dont bénéficiait Coop Fédérée. [18] Cette affaire soulève en premier lieu la… [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1 [1] The appellant, Ms. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
While that judgment made no reference to Grand Theft, it cited as the Offense Statute Number/s only section 812.014(2)(b)(1). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:01 am
Stevens, 130 S. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The question before us is whether the police’s failure to take any steps to implement or facilitate access to counsel is a breach of s. 10(b) in the circumstances. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Ogletree that, no, the State doesn’t need to introduce a copy of his marriage license or certificate to convict him of domestic violence; his wife’s testimony that they’re married is sufficient. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:40 pm
State, No. 112,556 (Shawnee)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Jonathan B. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Before the Appellate Division (the state’s intermediate appellate court), Trump’s lawyers allege multiple errors of state law on the part of the trial court. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
Yvonne B. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
Whether the United States can demonstrate that section 2(B) is facially preempted based on the potential that enforcement of section 2(B) could burden certain lawfully-present aliens or federal resources, even though section 2(B) merely asks Arizona’s law enforcement officers to exchange information with ICE that Congress has expressly required ICE to receive and provide. b. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE TRINITY B. [read post]
