Search for: "In Re Thinking MacHines Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 11:12 am
We're helping the populace, winning their trust. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
”]In re GMC Machine Tools Corp., Serial No. 88773861 (February 1, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
[Answer in first comment.]In re Universal Entertainment Corp., Serial No. 79161731 (September 21, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:46 pm
Think ho0tmail.com, hotma9l.com and hlotmail.com. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
Cir. 1998), and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:51 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:41 am
But we’re going to the “Wayback Machine” to remember this shareholder proposal from 1990 submitted by John Jennings “JJ” Crapo to the Bank of Boston. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:08 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark SUPERJAWS, finding it merely descriptive of machine tools and hand tools, including jaws and metal vice jaws. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm
I have been sitting on Xerox Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
Don’t you dare think what you’re thinking about me right now… there’ll be a link at the end and you can read the story for your-damn-self. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
I mean, was the cotton gin not an invention because it just means you’re doing through a machine what people used to do by hand? [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
” In re Dana Corp., 12 USPQ2d 1748, 1749 (TTAB 1989). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:49 am
In In Re Stephen W. [read post]
29 Mar 2006, 12:12 am
See In re Gould Paper Corp., 5 USPQ2d 1110 (Fed Cir. 1987). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(IP Think Tank) When is market destruction creative? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
