Search for: "In Re Tierney"
Results 1 - 20
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2007, 5:39 am
JOHN TIERNEY: Just in case we're living in a computer simulation, leave your messages for the designer here. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:12 pm
But if you look in the report for evidence of bias, you find studies showing that female graduate students in general (and those without children in particular) are as likely as men to finish their studies, and that theyâ € ™re as likely to have mentors and assistantship support. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:22 pm
JOHN TIERNEY: Ten things to scratch from your worry list: For most of the year, it is the duty of the press to scour the known universe looking for ways to ruin your day. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 6:45 pm
JOHN TIERNEY: Why not perpetual progress? [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:13 pm
Tierney’s lesson: “If you’re going to make that kind of mistake, do it on government time.” Well, we’ve certainly seen that observation borne out. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:54 pm
While the Tierney court’s decisions are loaded with procedural discussion, they’re important. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:57 am
JOHN TIERNEY: Legislation Won’t Close Gender Gap in Sciences. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 4:58 am
But what if you’re not the grateful sort? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:20 am
Loughner believed that dreams could be a sort of alternative, Matrix-style reality, and "that when you realize you're dreaming, you can do anything, you can create anything," Tierney says....There's a dream journal, which I'm sure we'll get to read. ... [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:26 am
Or are we just providing more evidence that weâ € ™re the Whiniest Generation? [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:22 am
“What you need to do while you’re here,” Tierney advised, “is expose yourself to the brilliant people around you as much as possible. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:38 pm
In a tongue-in-cheek article in the New York Times, writer John Tierney re-introduces his practically fail-proof formula, designed in 2006, for predicting the demise of Hollywood marriages, by relying on his friend, Garth Sundem’s statistical expertise, and his own in-depth literature review of articles published and sold in reading material at supermarket check-out lines. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 12:59 pm
Tierney's piece reveals to me a lot more about the human need for the sacred than it gives me a sense of whether we're all just butterflies dreaming that we're persons. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:26 am
For you doctors out there who believe that what happened to Jeff Skilling could never happen to you, take a moment to read the NY Times' John Tierney's chilling opening blog post on the re-trial of Dr. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:12 pm
John Tierney in the New York Times Science Findings : The Advantages of Closing a Few Doors tells us something about the legendary Chinese general:"The next time you're juggling options â€â [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 4:45 am
JOHN TIERNEY: Economic Optimism? [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
In a tongue-in-cheek article in the New York Times, writer John Tierney re-introduces his practically fail-proof formula, designed in 2006, for predicting the demise of Hollywood marriages, by relying on his friend, Garth Sundem’s statistical expertise, and his own in-depth literature review of articles published and sold in reading material at supermarket check-out lines. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
The question is if they’re willing to pay for the injuries they cause. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:18 pm
By analogy, statins work very well at lowering cholesterol, but they're not nearly as good at reducing mortality (and some combinations might even contribute to cancer). [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:28 pm
It would effectively outlaw at least 85% of the abortions sought in the state, according to opponents of the law, since that point is around six weeks into the pregnancy, before some women know they’re pregnant. [read post]
