Search for: "In Re US Order Pursuant to Provisions of Rule 6 (E)" Results 81 - 100 of 406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
That applies both to the San Antonio Court of Appeals and the Fifth Circuit panel in this example.Overall, the ratio would be 11 for arbitration and 6 against based on waiver. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am by Kyle Hulehan
There is no need to rush through a significant re-write of current U.S. cross-border rules. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:44 am by Susan Brenner
Accordingly, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the e-mail pursuant to Rule 404(b). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
The second was the vulnerability of the Cuban state at the beginning of its 2030 Economic Plan which relies on quite well managed foreign investment and a cautious effort to re-enter global financial and commercial markets. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am by Andrew Frisch
This case was before the court on the defendant’s motion for a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to prohibit plaintiffs from discovery of defendant’s attorney-client communications regarding the decision to classify certain employees as “executives” and thus exempt from overtime pay. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The State’s “civil service” has two components: the classified service[5] and the unclassified service.[6]  The Classified Service Let us first consider employment in the classified service as the majority the employees of New York State as an employer and the employees of its political subdivisions serve in positions in the classified service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The State’s “civil service” has two components: the classified service[5] and the unclassified service.[6]  The Classified Service Let us first consider employment in the classified service as the majority the employees of New York State as an employer and the employees of its political subdivisions serve in positions in the classified service. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm by Rita Zhao
§ 981(e)(6) (authorizing the government to use forfeited property to provide victims with restitution in civil forfeiture cases); 21 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am by INFORRM
The court’s approach is to apply the familiar balancing exercise described in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593; see, e.g., Re Al Maktoum (Reporting Restrictions Order) [2020] EWHC 702 (Fam); [2020] EMLR 17. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:11 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
The import of that order is that when, as here, a chapter 13 debtor files a motion to value collateral or a plan that has the effect of cramming down a secured claim, and the holder of that claim objects based upon the anti-cramdown provision of § 1325(a), the debtor will have the initial burden of going forward to show that the anti-cramdown provision is not applicable. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am by INFORRM
The Commission also ruled that freedom of expression can only be restricted pursuant to the Charter when the restriction serves a legitimate purpose and is proportionate and necessary in a democratic society. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm by Juan Antunez
Section XII(E) defines “issue” as “lineal descendants forever,” with the provision that “words of relationship in any degree includ[e] legally adopted persons. [read post]