Search for: "In Re US Shoe Corp. Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
I am thinking about test cases because of Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:13 am
If the test case comes out wrong, the thinking goes, we can re-litigate in one of the suspended cases. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
Ct. 1502, 1524-25 (1962) (“agree[ing] with the District Court that in this case a further division of product lines based on `price/quality’ differences [medium-priced shoes and low-priced shoes] would be `unrealistic'”); see also In re Live Concert Antitrust Li [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm
Further, in its motion, Louboutin cited In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 1245 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
Lunney: maybe architectural cases are more common because they’re worth bringing: in the absence of timely registration, actual damages might still be worth litigating. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:23 pm
Use words suitable for church, or court, so you won’t worry about how they sound if they’re read back to you, as they may be, in a five-day deposition, or someday, at a trial. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
BNSF Railway Corp., at *7. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
February 9, 2022 - 10:30 AM: In re J. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm
Credible standing is a problem in litigation over accessible websites. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
MOOTNESS FEES The Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 decision in In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Plano Molding Co., 696 F.3d 647, 655 (7th Cir. 2012); In re M/V Rickners Genoa Litig., 622 F. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
See In re Countrywide Corp. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Manor Drug Stores that Section 10(b) contains an implied right of action.[7] But the Court repeatedly declined to expand the scope of the implied private right of action – which it described as “a judicial oak which has grown from little more than a legislative acorn” – largely due to policy concerns related to the danger that Rule 10b-5 will be used as a vehicle for particularly vexatious litigation.[8] Throughout its securities jurisprudence, the Court has… [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm
” Primis stated that a hearing would not make sense, in part because of the Corps’ process on its new master manual and the litigation that has already resulted. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
However, at the same time the FTC was protecting consumers from false claims about the benefits of these curved sole fitness shoes, the USPTO was granting Skecher’s US Patent No. 7,886,460 for … a curved sole fitness shoe. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:53 am
RE,36791 entitled LOCATION SYSTEM ADAPTED FOR USE IN MULTIPATH ENVIRONMENTS and owned by Freshloc Technologies, Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:53 am
RE,36791 entitled LOCATION SYSTEM ADAPTED FOR USE IN MULTIPATH ENVIRONMENTS and owned by Freshloc Technologies, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
Id. at 188 (citing Beech Aircraft Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
” If you’re looking to invite future litigation over a shareholder buyout, you can’t do much better than using the undefined term “current value” as the sole pricing mechanism. [read post]
