Search for: "In Re United States, Petitioner"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
["By contrast, a holding that the President is not an 'Officer of the United States' would authoritatively resolve the Section 3 case against the Petitioner. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
The remained in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:15 am
"In view of that misunderstanding, the Board chose not to enter judgment by default, but instead gave petitioner a second opportunity to file an amended petition for cancellation.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Petitioner has filed a request for reconsideration with the Board, essentially re-arguing its motion. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am
Petitioner never relocated to the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:40 am
United States Dist. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Backstrom On October 13, 2017, Petitioners League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. filed a motion to expedite briefing and hearing in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
<> In Re: U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:59 am
Nos. 08-5573, 08-5574, 08A98 & 08A99 ===================================== IN THE Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- . --------------------------------- JOSÃâ [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Circuit heard oral argument in In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm
’s] customers) reasonably believed to be located outside the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
United States (relisted after 1/7 and 1/14 Conferences) Docket: 10-6549 Issue(s): Validity of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act and its implementing regulations Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner’s reply Letter from SG Response to SG’s letter Title: Roberts v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:39 am
The consul approved our application for the visa, but informed us that my husband appears as “excluded” from the United States and needed to receive permission from the Government to re-apply for admission to the country before a visa was issued. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 10-10554. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
United States, reversing and remanding Mr. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
United States, 133 S. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
United States, 575 U.S. 723 (2015). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
