Search for: "In Re United States Cellular Operating Company"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
Motorola Mobility appealed this order, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold a hearing on Tuesday, September 11.The Daubert motions are all about what the FRAND royalty rate should be, not about injunctive relief per se. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In In re A.D.W., A.L.W., and X.M.M., No 2-648 / 12-1060 (Iowa Ct. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
On December 14, 2007, Apple laid claim to the supposed novel invention of “list scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display,” the formal title of United States Patent 7,469,381 B2, with a patent application granted after a year-long review by the patent office that apparently didn’t include watching this scene from 2002’s Minority Report, where Tom Cruise does all of those things and more with a spiffy 3D… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case is United State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
There are many stereotypes in Germany about life in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
See, e.g., In re Synchronoss Sec. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:45 pm
Also in the case of United Taxi Operators (Urban) Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) and United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am
When the cellular phone emerged as a consumer product in the 1980s, it operated in 800 MHz frequencies, for which the FCC initially gave away two licenses for 40 MHz of spectrum in each of the 306 market areas in the United States – one to a wireless provider and one to a wired provider. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Now, HOAs are special; as such, debts to HOAs occupy a special class of debt, and merit a special section in Title 11, the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Thus, to prevail on contributory infringement in a Section 337 case, the complainant must show: (1) there is an act of direct infringement in violation of Section 337; (2) the accused device has no substantial non-infringing uses; and (3) the accused infringer imported, sold for importation, or sold after importation within the United States, the accused components that contributed to another's direct infringement. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
They deserve to know the truth about their health,” states Dr. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
People increasingly demand food in its natural form to nourish their bodies down to the cellular level. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:25 am
…Prosecutors said Sapsizian and Alcatel used a consulting company to funnel bribes to the Costa Rican official, who helped reward Alcatel with the cellular contracts. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
We’re not sure who does, but isn’t it nice to know you can with the UWCP Underwater Cellular Phone System. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
A dietary supplement company announced release of a product to help "calm the mind and maintain restful sleep. [read post]
