Search for: "In Re United States Cellular Operating Company"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 9:56 pm
Otherwise the bond or deposit wouldn't be necessary, but no one could have doubts for even one second whether Apple would appeal.There are technically two cases (one in which Apple Inc. is the defendant and another one where two European Apple entities, including the German company operating 15 local Apple Stores, are targeted). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
We’re not sure who does, but isn’t it nice to know you can with the UWCP Underwater Cellular Phone System. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Now, HOAs are special; as such, debts to HOAs occupy a special class of debt, and merit a special section in Title 11, the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Innovationpartners) Global - Patents Improving the global patent system needs buy-in from the C-suite and political leaders (IAM) Trilateral group meet in The Hague; under new pressure to harmonise patent processing (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Menu News) IP model proposed for the North-South nanotechnology divide (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Copyright Wrangling over the rights of the blind (Public Knowledge) Africa The Statesman (Ghana) reports piracy is most visible barrier… [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:37 pm
Likewise, rulings in the United States have found that Dish Network’s “Hopper” DVR, which automatically skips commercials, is not a copyright infringement either. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
In this connection, three salient points were made: We see no evidence of publicly owned companies in other industries behaving unethically as a pattern: No airlines cutting corners on [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Arguably, we’re so immersed in them that we know more about US law, especially relating to civil rights, than we do about Canadian rights. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
Motorola Mobility appealed this order, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold a hearing on Tuesday, September 11.The Daubert motions are all about what the FRAND royalty rate should be, not about injunctive relief per se. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
