Search for: "In Re United States Parole Commission, Petitioner"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 Following indictment against petitioner for criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) the state courts reasonably determined that petitioner had not made out a prima facie case; and 2) petitioner's post-conviction detention was not unlawful. . [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
BRUGMANN, Petitioner, v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Truscott would serve ten years before being released on parole. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
(And while you’re at it, see if they know what the hell a “bolo” is.) [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
” Brief for United States 21. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
”] Upon the defendant’s release from prison, the North Carolina Post-Release Supervision and Parole Commission (“the Commission”) prepared and executed a supervision agreement with the defendant, which stated the defendant would be subject to such searches by his assigned supervising officer. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Vasbinder, No. 06-2381 Grant of a habeas petition challenging a conviction and sentence for first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony is reversed as petitioner did not satisfy the gateway requirements for excusing a time-barred claim. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
The Court of Appeals next rejected the State’s argument that the search was valid under the “catch-all” provision of G.S. 15A-1368.4(c), which allows the Post-Release Supervision and Parole Commission (the Commission) to impose conditions it believes reasonably necessary to ensure a supervisee will lead a law-abiding life. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
If a lawfully admitted permanent resident is removable from the United States, he may seek cancellation of removal if, among other things, he has “resided in the United States continuously for 7 years after having been admitted in any status. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
Gore concurrence, or of the petitioners in Moore v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:26 pm
” When I came on with Governor Scott, one of the things I did was coordinate with prisons, probation, and paroles. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:26 pm
” When I came on with Governor Scott, one of the things I did was coordinate with prisons, probation, and paroles. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
