Search for: "In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
“The power of a U.S. Court to require compliance with U.S. discovery obligations does not arise until and unless the Court has jurisdiction.”
17 Mar 2015, 5:07 pm by K&L Gates
See e.g., In re Uranium Antitrust Litigation, 480 F.Supp. 1138 (N.D.Ill.1979); see also Rashbaum, et al., “U.S. [read post]
Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
E.D.Va. Considers Differing Circuit Interpretations of Leading Case on Availability of Default Judgment in Multiple-Defendant Cases
7 Dec 2006, 5:13 am
Whelan, 506 U.S. 906, 113 S.Ct. 300, 121 L.Ed.2d 223 (1992); In re Uranium Antitrust Litig., 617 F.2d 1248, 1256-58 (7th Cir.1980) (Frow rule not applicable when defendants are alleged to be jointly and severally liable); Int'l Controls Corp. v. [read post]
Federal Civil Practice Bulletin - http://federalcivilpracticebulletin.blogspot.com/