Search for: "In Re Welzel"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
Answer: look at 11 USC 502 and Welzel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:49 am
(In re Welzel), 275 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2001).] , where the court held that, notwithstanding the provisions of the contract or the provisions of O.C.G.A. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 2:43 pm
” In re Welzel, 275 F.3d at 1318. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:49 am
(In re Welzel), 275 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2001).] , where the court held that, notwithstanding the provisions of the contract or the provisions of O.C.G.A. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
" The court disagreed with the creditor's contention that the Eleventh Circuit implicity recognized an unsecured creditor's entitlement to attorney's fees in In re Welzel, 275 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir.2001).Robert Eisenbach, III of In the (Red) Business The Bankruptcy Blog points out in a post dated July 26, 2007 that the Middle District of Florida Bankruptcy Court did not cite to the In re Qmect, Inc. [read post]
