Search for: "In Re Whittemore" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“They’re not thinking about what they’re going to say whenever they’re asked about the money,” he said. [read post]
21 Mar 2005, 5:01 pm
[JURIST] CBS-10 TV in Tampa is reporting that US District Judge James Whittemore has ended this afternoon's hearing on Terri Schiavo's parents' petition for the re-insertion of her feeding tube pending a federal hearing of her case without making a ruling or even setting a timeframe for a ruling. [read post]
22 Mar 2005, 6:32 am
[JURIST] CBS WTSP-TV 10 in Tampa is reporting that US District Judge James Whittemore has refused to order the re-insertion of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, saying that the brain-damaged Florida woman's parents had not established a "substantial likelihood of success" at trial on the merits of their arguments. 7:40 AM ET - Read Judge Whittemore's 13-page order [PDF] refusing the temporary [read post]
21 Mar 2005, 4:15 am
[JURIST] US District Judge James Whittemore of the Middle District of Florida has scheduled a hearing for 3 PM Monday afternoon [PDF order] to consider a request to have feeding resumed for Terri Schiavo [JURIST news archive]. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Whittemore signed an order in yet another generic Reglan lawsuit that accused the manufacturers of failing to properly warn patients of the tardive dyskinesia risks linked to the drug. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 9:14 am by Jessica Smith
Whittemore, 255 N.C. 583, 585-86 (1961); In re J.F., ___ N.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
"This perpetrator has the highest rate of re-offending than with any other serious crime, so it's an important crime to prosecute," Whittemore said.- Lie, lie, lie... [read post]
15 May 2008, 1:43 pm
In response, an RIAA spokeswoman said, "if we have to re-try the case, we will do so without hesitation. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
The only non-Supreme Court decision that Amgen cites is Whittemore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
Whittemore, 552 N.W.2d 705 (Minnesota Supreme Court1996), an exception to this rule exists when the parties are in a special relationship and the harm to the plaintiff is foreseeable. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
We're not that stupid up here," he said. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:34 pm
"We're not that stupid up here. [read post]