Search for: "In Re Yoder" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 9:16 am by Venkat Balasubramani
High Schooler’s Facebook Post Can Constitute the Crime of Menacing – In re P.T. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:37 am by Scott Bomboy
Due process rights for teenagers In 1968, the Court ruled in an 8-1 decision in the case of In re Gault that teens accused of crimes are entitled to the same due process rights as adults. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:46 am
Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; and Marion Yoder, Senior Assistant Public Defender. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
The Court noted Appellant was re-arguing the facts. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:28 am by Caroline Lynch
Yoder and Polis re-introduced the Email Privacy Act to update the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) (there is no Senate companion bill yet). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
Upper Perkiomen School District * Tweeting Death Threats Isn’t Juvenile Delinquency–In re R.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Harvard-Westlake Nursing Student’s Blog Post Doesn’t Support Expulsion–Yoder v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And Nomi Stolzenberg’s remarkable survey of my work over many years asks a truly crucial question: Is it possible for intellectually committed “secularists” and what might be called the “seriously religious” to get along at the present time, which I must say is very different from, say, the world in which the central law-and-religion case was Yoder? [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) (For an introduction to this series of posts, see here.) [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am by Marty Lederman
 That has not been the basis for any of the cases in which the Court has recognized a right to religious exemptions (the Sherbert line of unemployment benefit cases; Yoder; O Centro; and Holt); and if it were the rule, the Court would have granted exemptions in several cases where it did not.In Braunfeld v. [read post]