Search for: "In Re bridgestone/firestone, Inc. Tires Products Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 649 F. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
Tires Products Liability Litigation, 153 F. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
You'd probably expect that two guys whose idea of recreation includes commenting on drug and medical device product liability litigation would be members of the American Law Institute - and you'd be right. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
We’ve been around the preemption block a few times – we know what happens when the mainstay claim in prescription medical product liability litigation, that being inadequate warnings, gets preempted.We first saw it in DTP vaccine litigation. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
On the one hand, in In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 611 F. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
The Supreme Court overturned one of our sentimental favorites, In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, reporters notes to comment l (1998). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:57 am
Tires Products Liability Litigation, 333 F.3d 763 (7th Cir. 2003), that Bexis amicused for PLAC. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
On aggregation, we're essentially traditionalists. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In all likelihood, the same thing couldn’t happen again today.Still, for personal and professional reasons we mourn the result because of Bexis’ involvement in winning that issue (the unanimous Supreme Court now says wrongly) in the first such case to be litigated, In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation, 333 F. 3d 763 (7th Cir. 2003). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
Ordinarily the ability to plead res judicata or collateral estoppel gives a litigant adequate protection against being harassed by repetitive litigation by the loser in a previous suit against him. [read post]
12 May 2006, 5:46 am
Attorney Tom Woodrow provided a detailed look, from the defense attorney perspective, of how structured settlements helped Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. evaluate and settle a series of cases relating to tire failures. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
We’re very aware of that issue, since Bexis had a hand in winning it in In re BridgeStone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Gibson Dunn already is seeing a surge in labor and employment, consumer fraud, and products liability litigation. [read post]
