Search for: "In Re the Florida Bar-Code of Judicial Conduct"
Results 81 - 89
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Peters, No. 05-6101 "A sentence imposed on remand for offenses arising out of a tax fraud scheme is reversed and remanded for re-sentencing where the district court's failure to address defendant's "time-served" argument did not satisfy the "procedural reasonableness" requirement required by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Geerken, No. 06-3987"A sentence for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court's use of a U.S.S.G. application note's 75:1 ratio for determining the number of images contained within a single video was not arbitrary and did not result in an unreasonable sentence for defendant; and 2) the district court did not err when it found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the child pornography possessed by defendant not only depicted minors under the age of… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
The ball of judicial salaries is in the legislative "court. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
County of San Diego, No. 05-56202Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations does not create judicially enforceable rights that may be vindicated by an individual in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 8:56 pm
Judge Angel's comments to the press violate the Code of Judicial Conduct, Cannon 3(B)(9). [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
DeGennaro, No. 06-4195 Order holding that retrial of defendants would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and denying motions to bar retrial and dismiss the indictment is reversed where: 1) the decision of the trial court that there was "manifest necessity" to declare a mistrial was an abuse of discretion; and 2) a statement by counsel in support of a motion for mistrial, quickly reconsidered, does not preclude the defendant from claiming that the Double Jeopardy Clause… [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
They're not as powerful as straight preemption, but in some situations they might have more appeal.The first of these is what we call judicial deference. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Florida, 05-8820 While Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 8:08 am
"Canon 2 (c) code of Judicial Conduct, states a judge should not hold membership in an organization that practices invidious discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion or national origin. [read post]
