Search for: "In Re the Marriage of: Stanford v. Stanford"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 1:27 pm
The Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Karlan, of Stanford Law School and (temporarily) the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Karlan a Stanford law professor currently working at the Department of Justice. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jane Schachter concludes that the case “will present an occasion for the Court—and especially Justice Kennedy—to reflect on” its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
So, if you're right about that, why should we even entertain the question whether to overrule Smith? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:47 am
But if you’re a real textualist, all of that is beside the point. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
In Winsdor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:28 am
“Overruling [Roe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re notes that “a significant chunk of the briefing” in Heien v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:04 am
This beaming bride is the daughter of First Circuit Judge Kermit V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:19 am
Ginsburg officiated at Wiesenfeld’s marriage to Elaine Harris in front of family and friends, including Jason Wiesenfeld, the little boy at the center of Weinberger v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm
Today, though, in Horne v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Riggs v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Pierce v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
(In Re Collado-Munoz, 21 I. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Jane Schacter is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jim Sonne discusses the Court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
