Search for: "In Re the Regents of the University of California, Petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Scientific Atlanta (In re Charter Communications) and the failure of the Solicitor General to file a brief on behalf of the SEC, Monday, June 11 was also the date that the Petitioners (the Regents of the University of California) filed their reply to the opposition brief with respect to their petition for certiorari in Regents v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
We’re grateful to learn of a legal historians' brief in Comcast Corporation, Petitioner v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 10-1029, which was included in last week’s Petitions to Watch. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 10-1029, the preemption case from the California Supreme Court involving resident tuition rates for unlawful aliens, mentioned in last week’s post. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm by Christa Culver
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in… [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm by Christa Culver
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners' reply The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of May 26. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:32 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Gail Heriot
Regents of the University of California (1976), which (unlike the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm by Christa Culver
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in… [read post]
         CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are one CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]