Search for: "In Re the Welfare of C.M." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2014, 1:48 pm by Kysa Crusco
The issue was argued before the New Hampshire Supreme Court in In Re C.M, where the Court held that parents do not have a constitutional per se right to counsel, though appointment of counsel should be considered on a case by case basis. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:20 pm by Russell Knight
One Illinois appeals court determined that a“[parties’]’ due process rights were denied by the trial court’s ruling which allowed [a witness] to testify by telephone over objection” In re C.M, 319 Ill. [read post]