Search for: "In THE MATTER OF McINERNEY"
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 3:40 am
Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, 464 F.3d 328, 337 (2d Cir. 2006) (quoting Grago v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, 464 F.3d 328, 337 (2d Cir. 2006) (citing Rosner v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:50 am
Each patient is entitled to maintenance of the confidentiality implicit in his or her attendance in a physician’s examining room and protection of his or her privacy on a personal matter, absent serious concerns relating to health or safety, or express legislative provisions compelling release of the information in the public interest. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:11 am
This dual judicial approval is required because the settlement actually represents two different funds to be paid in settlement of two different matters. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:36 pm
(Toronto: Butterworths, 1987), at p. 203. 17 Finally, the Supreme Court of Canada in McInerney v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:06 pm
Michael Klausner Jason Hegland There have been a number of important developments in class action securities litigation case filings in the recent years. [read post]
