Search for: "In The Interest of J.B. of: J.B. - No. (Granted)" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Granting a divorce would represent noting the validity of a same-sex marriage "under the laws where it was formed," rather than a judgment that the marriage was valid in Texas.If the appellate court reaches the constitutional questions of Callahan's decision, J.B.'s attorneys argue that Baker does not have binding effect, because Baker concerned marriage, not divorce, and courts have distinguished the fundamental "liberty interests" in each. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Unlike with J.B. and H.B., this divorce was not uncontested. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:48 pm
      When the benefits to granting the order outweigh the negative effects, having regard not just to the interests of the litigants but also the rights of the public. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:03 am by Don Cruse
They filed a petition, which has been docketed as In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B., No. 11-0024 (more information). [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
They granted a writ of mandamus filed by the defendant against the judge. [read post]