Search for: "In The Matter Of: J.D.B" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The court also discusses the United State Supreme Court’s holding in J.D.B. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:15 pm by Kevin Lapp
One of the Supreme Court cases was J.D.B., which held that a suspect's age is relevant to determining whether an individual is in custody for purposes of Miranda. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:42 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
  Perhaps this Court just has a soft spot for kids (see, for instance, last term’s decision in J.D.B. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Perhaps this Court just has a soft spot for kids (see, for instance, last term’s decision in J.D.B. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
In two arguments, one after the other, next Tuesday, March 20, the Supreme Court returns to the constitutional issue of punishment for juveniles who commit serious crimes — this time, whether they may be sentenced to life in prison without a chance for parole after being convicted of murder. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm by Michael O'Hear
 To the extent that such proceedings are formally labeled civil or criminal seems less a function of the logical application of some clear rule than a matter of convention or convenience. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-11328.pdf J.D.B. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Nabiha Syed
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times applauds the Court’s recent decision in J.D.B. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:47 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in J.D.B. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:08 am by Russ Bensing
” In other action, the Court had oral argument in J.D.B. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
  As a policy matter, it makes sense to apply criminal law protections in civil cases when those cases cross the line from compensation to punishment. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
That O’Connor opinion, plus the fact that Yarborough did not explicitly settle the age issue as a general constitutional matter under Miranda, provided the rationale for J.D.B. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm by Craig Livermore
 In the Matter of J.D.B., the Supreme Court of North Carolina held that a 13 year old burglary suspect who was interrogated by police officials in his school without parental notification and consent, was not in custody, and thus he was not entitled to have Miranda warnings read to him. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
Louis Globe-Democrat) has coverage of the cert. grant in J.D.B. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:34 am by Kent Scheidegger
  In the Matter of J.D.B., the North Carolina Supreme Court did not find the juvenile to be "in custody. [read post]