Search for: "In The Matter Of: R.C" Results 1 - 20 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 8:26 am by MBettman
Defendants would be subject to multiple suits and potentially to further liability in matters that were previously resolved. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am by MBettman
Union, 2004-Ohio-5770 (Termination of employment is a matter that arises out of the employment relationship.) [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:14 am by ---------------------------------
If you should have any questions, please contact any of our offices to discuss this matter further with one of our workers’ compensation attorneys.Contact: Kevin J. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:20 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that under current state law, when a claimant or employer appeals an order of the Ohio Industrial Commission in a workers’ compensation case to a common pleas court, failure by the appellant to name the administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) as a party and to serve the administrator with a copy of the appeal notice as required by R.C. 4123.512 are not “jurisdictional” defects (i.e., are not errors that deprive… [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
(allowing expenses from a mortgage sale to extinguish receivership fees with mortgagee acquiescence and full participation in the matter); see also, Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am by MBettman
(“It matters not whether the action is brought in tort or contract, if the resultant damages are injury to property of the type set forth in R.C. 2305.131, the statute applies. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:27 pm
” Accordingly, the ban related to filing a lawsuit after a matter has been arbitrated applies to cases filed under § 4112.99. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am by MBettman
She would find that R.C. 3107.07(A) must be strictly construed in favor of a non-consenting parent, and that a child support payment, no matter how meager, is still maintenance and support, thus requiring parental consent to the adoption. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
As an initial matter, the Ohio Supreme Court observed that both Article II, Section 34a and R.C. 4111.14(B) state that the term “employee” shall have the same meanings as provided in the FLSA. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am by MBettman
By definition, a creditor who fails to timely present its claim to the decedent’s estate cannot prove, as a matter of law, the decedent is unable to pay the claim such that a claim cannot be brought against the spouse under R.C. 3103.03. [read post]