Search for: "In re: 2703(d) Application"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 5:55 am
The Application at issue in this matter crosses the Section 2703(d) bar. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
§ 2703(D), 930 F.Supp. 2d 698 (U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
§ 2703(d), 2011 U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
See In re Sealing and Non–Disclosure of Pen/Trap/2703(d) Orders, 562 F.Supp.2d 876, 881–883 (U.S. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:01 am
§ 2703(d) (stating that a court order “shall issue only if the governmental entity” meets the requisite standard); 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
§ 2703(d), 830 F. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
§ 2703(d), 830 F. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:33 am
In re Application of the United States for Historic Cell Site Data, No. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with some comments by Eric] In re: sec. 2703(d) Order; 10GJ3793; Miscellaneous Case No. 1:11dm00003 (E.D. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
”[1] The asserted legal authority for these PLI warrants’[2] was SCA § 2703(c)(1)(A). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
If the government obtains a warrant under § 2703(a), it can compel an ISP “to disclose everything that would be produced in response to a section 2703(d) order or a subpoena as well as unopened e-mails stored by the provider for less than 180 days. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:55 am
Part III will provide the relevant Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, explain the language and protections provided under the SCA, and examine the Third Circuit’s interpretation and application of the statute to a § 2703(d) order request. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Until this Application is clarified, it will be denied.In re Matter, supra(emphasis in the original). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:22 am
§ 2703(d)). [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
So according to the Third Circuit, a magistrate judge has discretion to turn down an application for an order even if the 2703(d) order is satisfied. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:33 pm
See 18 U.S.C. 2703(d). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:18 am
§ 2703(d); In re Application of U.S., 509 F. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
Today the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion, which is available here: In Re: Application of the United States of America for Historical Cell Site Data. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:17 am
See In re § 2703(d) Order, 2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:06 am
Mass. 2012)Despite the concerns of Alito and Sotomayor in Jones, probable cause is not required for issuance of a 2703(d) order to obtain historical CSLI until the Supreme Court or Congress “definitively considers the matter. [read post]
