Search for: "In re: 2703(d) Application"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
* In re Application of the USA for an Order Pursuant to 2703(d), 1:11-dm-00003-TCB –LO (E.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
It’s one of the “hybrid” orders that DOJ has tried to use (or at least was using as of 2006, the date of the order) that combines several statutory authorities at once — pen trap, 2703(d), subpoena, etc. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am
§ 2703(c)-(d). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
(The subsequent enactment of § 2703(d) in 1994 was a new court order authority for noncontent records, which is at issue in the Carpenter cell-site case. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
§ 2703(d), a provision in the federal Stored Communications Act, for historical records regarding the phones. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Magistrate Judge Orenstein acknowledges that the government’s application satisfies Section 2703(c). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
The third-party doctrine has had very wide application. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:56 am
Even Fox News chief political analyst Brit Hume, while voicing concerns about Trump’s conduct, did a version of the “many-Republicans-believe” dodge recently: At the same time, of course, . . . we’re going to hear an awful lot about the unequal application of justice from [Trump’s] defenders and perhaps from his defense team in light of the way in particularly the Hillary Clinton case was handled, where she was, where James Comey, then FBI director,… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
., In re Synchronoss Sec. [read post]
