Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation"
Results 201 - 208
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Consumer fraud claims of patients using Propulsid who suffered no physical injury and did not allege paying for the drug alleged insufficient injury.In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 208 F.R.D. 133 (E.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:29 am
Then, fight like the dickens for three years.The average state statute of limitations for a product liability case is two years; after three years, the statute has expired in 42 of the 50 states. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
Id. at 1313.A classic "type one" mass tort example of the "you failed to warn about something else" claim arose in In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, 331 F. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:04 am
Essentially no one goes to trial on his own money any more.That does mean, however, that product liability lawsuits are somewhat more likely to go to trial than other cases. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 8:01 am
As regular readers of this blog know, the dynamics of products liability litigation can change in a heartbeat if the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the "MDL Panel" or "Panel") grants (or denies) a motion to centralize related cases in a single district court. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 611 F. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 10:55 am
Those blogs, however, don't limit themselves to product liability (or drug and device) law; they analyze litigation much more generally.In addition to product liability law, drug and device folks care about FDA regulatory law. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:01 am
Bush's domestic platform was reforming tort law, which includes class action lawsuits, asbestos liability, and medical malpractice liability. [read post]
