Search for: "In re: Chocolate Confectionary v."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 1:13 am
Defendants have filed motions to dismiss in the multi-district litigation cases captioned In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, and are awaiting a ruling from Judge Conner of the Middle District of Pennsylvania.Briefing on the motions was completed in December, and oral argument was held before the Court on January 16. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:32 am
[Of course, under Wal-mart v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:45 am
Panrico opposed, citing a number of earlier national and international word and figurative trade marks, including the Spanish word mark DOGHNUTS, registered for “all kinds of confectionary and pastry products and preparations and products and preparations for sweets and confections; sugar, chocolate, tea, cocoa, coffee and substitutes thereof, vanilla, essences and products and preparations for making caramel cream and cakes, chocolate and sugar-based… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:38 am
Although sympathizing with Cook's plight, the Board pointed out that Cook could have tried to narrow the scope of the cited mark via Section 18, or could have sought a consent from the registrant.In re Hershey Chocolate and Confectionary Corp., Serial No. 77809223 (June 28, 2012) [not precedential]. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step) US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM) US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office is extended… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:57 am
The court in MDL 1935, In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, used Rule 58(b) in this way. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) Germany German Federal Patent Court finds ‘Weihnachts-Zauber’ (Christmas magic) lacks distinctiveness for chocolate confectionary (Class 46) WANGZHIHE: To win trademark squatting case through anti-fair competition law (IP China) India India frees up foreign payment of royalties (IP finance) Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Patent Attorney failed to exercise due care; barred from making further changes to… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office) China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
