Search for: "In re: Davis v." Results 1 - 20 of 1,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2008, 2:31 am
Gemma Ltd (in liquidation) v Davies and another; In re Gemma Ltd (in liquidation); [2008] EWHC 546 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 89 “In order to establish that a person was a de facto director of a company it was necessary, inter alia, to plead and prove that he undertook functions in relation to the company which could properly be discharged only by a director. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:37 pm
Levenhagen, as somewhat similar to the Court's order two months ago in In re Troy Davis. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
  But, if the Court were unwilling to take that step (advocated in Davis v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:35 pm
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, S236208)Dissolution et liquidation d'un "partnership" : référence de doctrine en matière de liquidation. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Davis served as special counsel to President Bill Clinton, who offers a testimonial on Davis’s (somewhat barebones) website, and Boies represented Al Gore in Bush v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 10:38 am
This one catches the eye at the outset because the caption lists the case as "Reno v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 3:24 am by SHG
You might have read about the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:52 am by Marty Schwimmer
The Hornets should be watchable this year, what with Davis and Rivers. complaint shirtail v hornetsvar docstoc_docid="125590810";var docstoc_title="complaint shirtail v hornets";var docstoc_urltitle="complaint shirtail v hornets"; [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:30 pm by SCOTUStalk
 Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. [read post]