Search for: "In re: Energy Future Holdings Corp., et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2023, 5:26 pm
Collis, et al., C.A. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired energy consumed by operations owned or controlled by the company. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
One future General Counsel and Chairman of the Commission wrote then that the SEC “should impose affirmative environmental disclosure requirements upon all corporate entities subject to its jurisdiction”; “[t]hat the Commission’s authority is not so limited as to preclude such an approach,” he thought, “is apparent from a reading of its statutory authority. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Compare In re NVIDIA Corp. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
Defendant in the underlying Columbian case, Ministerio deAmbiente y Desarrollo Sostenible et al could file a motion to quash the subpoenas ordered by the Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
White et al., supra, afford her a remedy. 19 I do not regard the Code as in any way impeding the appropriate development of the common law in this important area. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
County of Kern, et al. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
I am happy to announce the publication of "The Human Rights Obligations of Stet-Owned Enterprises: Emerging Conceptual Structure and Principles in National and International Law and Policy," which appears in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational law 50(4):827-888 (2017). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
” Necessarily, one could interpret the court’s application of the “Direct means Direct” approach to the facts before it, as an opening for a future insured to broaden the “Direct means Direct” legal structure and which may eventually mirror the “Proximate Cause” interpretation. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers, et al., 803 F.3d 31 (D.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) require an analysis of how existing environmental conditions will impact future residents or users (receptors) of a proposed project? [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Army Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago manage the system in a manner that will allow carp to move into the Great Lakes, in violation of the federal common law of public nuisance. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
(IPBiz) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Despatch Industries – In PV furnace case green patent litigation moves upstream (Green Patent Blog) Heathcote Holdings Corp – False marking Plaintiff’s chosen form not given deference: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
In the August 2010 volume of The Colorado Lawyer, Ronald M. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
., et al, Civil No. 2:10-cv-05051-GW (PLAx) (C.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
