Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 1 - 20 of 18,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
R (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Bailey) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison [2008] EWCA Civ 177; [2008] WLR (D) 84 “Long-term prisoners who had been convicted of offences committed after 29 September 1998 and before 4 April 2005, and who after 4 April 2005 had been released on licence, recalled and then re-released having served three-quarters of their sentences, remained subject to… [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked counsel Roy Englert on Monday at the Supreme Court, in a re-enactment of the 1948 Supreme Court case Goesaert v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Moore of the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, will be sitting in place of Chief Justice George in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:13 am by Megan La Belle
Next week the justices will hear oral argument in Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Writing for seven of the justices (all but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch), Justice Clarence Thomas took a straight and simple route to upholding the statute. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 2:34 am
In my FindLaw column today (re Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:54 am by First Mondays
The Supreme Court’s long break is over and we’re here to preview some of the most interesting cases from the February sitting. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am by tracey
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:08 am by michael
Regina (Oakes) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1169; [2010] WLR(D) 267 “The different wording of the tests to be applied when considering the suitability for automatic release of a prisoner who had been recalled to prison for breaching the terms of his licence, under ss 255A(5) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as inserted by section 29(2) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) was deliberate. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:10 am
Something a bit different - video of the oral argument before the Indiana Supreme Court of In re Paternity of K.I.: J.I. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Re (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment? [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm
Author Anthony Appleyard Licence  CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsA Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Zacaroli) Puma SE v Nike Innovate CV [2021] EWHC 1438In Trade Marks - Equisafety v Battle Hayward and Bower 7 Jan 2021 IP Northwest, I discussed Mr Nicholas Caddick QC's judgment in Equisafety Ltd v Battle, Hayward and Bower, Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 3296 (IPEC) (8 Dec 2021) where [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Kedar
Much has been made of the memo that William Rehnquist wrote as a clerk to Justice Robert Jackson advising him to uphold Plessy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm by Jason Mazzone
At least we think they’re distinguishable. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm by Bartolus
First of all, President Skouris has been re-elected President of the Court of Justice until October 6th 2012. [read post]