Search for: "In re: Mark Brown v."
Results 21 - 40
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 8:11 am
We’re talking about a discriminatory denial of information. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
MISCELLANY Merpel McKitten re-published a book review ‘Developments and Directions in Intellectual Property Law: 20 Years of the IPKat’ by Bill Patry (Mayer Brown), as published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice here. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Twenty Years of The IPKat was published by Oxford University Press in spring 2023.And, speaking of the book, we are happy to re-publish the review that Bill Patry (Mayer Brown) provided of it, as just published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
“When we perform our investigations, we’re really looking for a common source or exposure point,” she said. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC, No. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
But if our luncheon guests put all these issues aside, as you're supposed to do in my heaven, I bet Frankfurter and Freund are absolutely wowed by Mark's spectacular book. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
“But dog toys,” she concluded “are just utilitarian goods and you’re using somebody else’s mark as a source identifier, and that’s not a First Amendment problem. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
To mark Women’s History Month, we’re celebrating the trailblazing women who have led the way for change and who embody the spirit of progress in the legal space. [read post]
