Search for: "In re: Mark Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 1,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2009, 10:49 am by Tom Smith
Mark in the comments notes a program comment: "Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!! [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:57 pm
Category: 103    By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor    TitleIn re Haase, No. 2012-1690 (Fed. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:21 am by Eric Lipman
Today's addition is inspired by the story of Mark Smith, a 59-year-old would-be bank robber from Watsonville, Cal., a super-cute little town that I know I've been to at some point in my life, but can't remember why. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:41 am by Michael C. Smith
Tomorrow afternoon will mark the final milestone in the renovation of the historic Hub Shoe Store building at 111-113 East Austin Street into Siebman, Burg, Phillips & Smith LLP's law offices in Marshall as we dedicate the new historical marker that celebrates the building's prior occupant, the Hub Shoe Store from 1897-2001. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 2:51 pm
(If you're keeping numeric score, as Movable Type faithfully is under the hood, this is column #855 on "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:44 pm by Joe Patrice
The discussion begins at the 34:00 mark. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
In re Peter Wood, Geoffrey Dean-Smith, and Tasha Mudd, Serial No. 87022288 (October 25, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:28 am by Jason Caplain
Mark Rostick from Intel Capital and I were invited to speak at NC Spark last night. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 3:56 am
In re Smith & Vandiver, Corp., Serial No. 88477576 (December 20, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Martha B. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:25 pm by Buce
  And however kind the memories, the word "feckless" might not be too far off the mark. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
In In re Taylor Tate, Inc., Serial No. 78463524 (December 1, 2006) [not citable], the Board found Applicant's spa services to be related to hair and skin care products, and it consequently affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below [DAY SPA & SHOP disclaimed] in light of the registered mark LOVJOI.Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 5:34 am
"We're fully prepared for trial," Post said. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
Smith perceptively maintained that SOL-R is a novel spelling of SOLAR. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:29 am
Smith maintained that because the design of the letter “O” in applicant’s mark is highly similar to the entirety of registrant’s mark, the marks as a whole may be easily confused. [read post]