Search for: "In re: NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME " Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2017, 12:55 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 The Ninth Circuit, in In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litig., 724 F.3d 1268, 1271 (9th Cir. 2013), considered a similar challenge raised by former student athletes to a video game, which allowed individuals to “control avatars representing college football players as those avatars participate in simulated games,” and ruled that the material at issue did not constitute “publishing or… [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 11:41 am by Lyle Denniston
  It noted that student athletes’ names, images, and likenesses as players have been reproduced in video games for which the NCAA had barred any compensation. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:31 am by Kelly
NCAA student-athletes graduate at a higher rate than their counterparts in the general student population across almost all demographics—highlighting that without question NCAA member institutions are meeting and exceeding that standard for tax-exempt status. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 11:37 am by Tom Smith
  Student athletes in California have only been able to profit off their name, image, and likeness — known as NIL — since new NCAA rules and a state law took effect last year, but such agreements are already evolving into an estimated $500 million dollar market nationally. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 10:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Well, in his concurrence, he framed things a bit differently: But this case involves only a narrow subset of the NCAA's compensation rules—namely, the rules restricting the education-related benefits that student athletes may receive, such as post-eligibility scholarships at graduate or vocational schools. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:45 am by Ana Popovich
A different case involved student athletes engaging in drug use, also in violation of NCAA rules. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The other case was In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The other case was In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The other case was In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation (Keller v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by ACLU
Trans athletes have been able to participate in the Olympics, the NCAA, and other elite sports for many years, yet we’ve literally never had a trans person qualify for the Olympics and there are no examples of trans dominance in any elite sport anywhere in the world. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:36 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
But consider this: while SAT scores now range from 600 to 2400 for college students, the NCAA allows athletes who score 820 (downloads as pdf) to participate in Division II programs so long as they maintain a C average. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 10:11 am by Chris Skelton
These allow student athletes to engage in NIL activities to the extent that this complies with state laws, as well as NCAA rules and any restrictions imposed by their conference or school. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 12:31 pm by Holly Brezee
NCAA athletes are now able to profit off their NIL if it’s done in accordance with state laws where the school is located. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 11:19 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  The recently intensifying degradation of college sports has been ongoing for decades, for example, but the court decisions and state laws that allowed 'name, image, and likeness' payments to be made to athletes turned out to be the beginning of the end, even though NIL seemed to be a minor sideshow at the time. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 7:47 am by fjhinojosa
The panel focused on recent state legislation and NCAA bylaw revisions relating to the ability of student-athletes to monetize their name, image, and likeness. 3. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Relatedly, the court rejected the idea that no right of publicity was necessary because players are financially rewarded through endorsement, sponsorship, and the like—this doesn’t apply to college athletes, and the NCAA most recently estimated that “[l]ess than [two] in 100, or 1.6 percent, of NCAA senior football players will get drafted by a National Football League (NFL) team. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Isaac Rice
Weber, professors at Creighton University School of Law, argued that student visa restrictions prevent foreign student athletes from benefiting from recent NCAA rule changes that allow student athletes to profit off of their names, images, and likenesses. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:12 am by Matt Johnston
 Mataconis also notes that Corbett is up for re-election in 2014. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm by Gordon Firemark
For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]” Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio Show Notes Follow Ups Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p… In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx? [read post]