Search for: "In re: Nomination of James E. May, IV (Per Curiam Order)"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
In the Order, the court noted that CRST was a “prevailing party” and stated that “CRST may file an application for attorneys' fees from the EEOC[.] [read post]
