Search for: "In re: P.S" Results 41 - 60 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by David Snyder
In In re: Petition of the Borough of Downingtown, one of the issue that will be decided is: Where a municipality has satisfied the requirement to dispose of condemned property under Section 310(a) of the Eminent Domain Code by abandoning the purpose for which the property was condemned, does the Donated or Dedicated Property Act, Act of Dec. 15, 1959, P.L. 1772, 53 P.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by Phil Coulson
In In re: Petition of the Borough of Downingtown, one of the issue that will be decided is: Where a municipality has satisfied the requirement to dispose of condemned property under Section 310(a) of the Eminent Domain Code by abandoning the purpose for which the property was condemned, does the Donated or Dedicated Property Act, Act of Dec. 15, 1959, P.L. 1772, 53 P.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by David Snyder
In In re: Petition of the Borough of Downingtown, one of the issue that will be decided is: Where a municipality has satisfied the requirement to dispose of condemned property under Section 310(a) of the Eminent Domain Code by abandoning the purpose for which the property was condemned, does the Donated or Dedicated Property Act, Act of Dec. 15, 1959, P.L. 1772, 53 P.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:35 am
Better yet, you're also eligible for a pension plan. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:08 am
P.S. - On the merits, I agree with Justice Wiseman that there's no due process right of judicial review for the issuance of CDC 115's that don't involve the loss of custody credits. [read post]