Search for: "In re: PROCEEDINGS REGARDING CONDUCT OF COUNSEL"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
” At the start of the argument, counsel for the petitioner, Michel Paradis (a Lawfare contributor), stated that Spath had violated at least four clear and indisputable rules of judicial conduct, any one of which would warrant the vacatur of the proceeding. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
Our comments and those made by other senior officials regarding gender-neutral staffing of guard forces at JTF-GTMO have given rise to a concern that the comments may have appeared to be intended to influence the proceedings. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Regards, Roy] Quirky Question # 196: I am the general counsel of a corporation in the medical device industry. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
Patent Office following re-examinations that were launched by Fairchild. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
[quoting In re Bose Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1938, 1939 (Fed. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 5:06 am
Soon thereafter, however, class counsel for the certified nationwide class action pending in California contacted the district court and advised that he had “reason to believe that the parties here are attempting to settle the claims belonging to the California Actions class, without the knowledge or consent of the class representatives or Class Counsel” and that the parties to the Florida class action had refused voluntarily to provide information in this… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 11:17 am
Paul Trudelle: I guess you’re right. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
So the judiciary committee already has the power to conduct staff depositions and [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 10:17 am
There was no procedural irregularity in the hearing proceeding. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:18 am
Learned Counsel Rick Kammen rises to make a record regarding the disparity in prosecution and defense resources. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
However, in doing so, the Supreme Court has culled out the principles regarding duties and conduct of advocates. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
Pallanisami has examined the power of the Courts with regard to re-opening the evidence and recalling witnesses. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
It is defense counsel, not the mitigation specialist, that are responsible for conducting the investigation into the defendant’s background. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:43 pm
An investigative panel that finds probable cause to believe that a judge or justice engaged in conduct that warrants public discipline by the Supreme Court may authorize a disciplinary or disability proceeding against the judge. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
Further, a heavy measure of deference should be given to counsel’s judgments in regard to trial strategy. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
Pursuant to its analysis of a party’s discovery obligations under Rule 26(g)—which the court determined requires counsel to make a reasonable inquiry under the circumstances—the court found that the defendant “did not conduct a reasonable inquiry. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
In this regard, the SCOV “cannot conclude as a matter of law on the basis of the undisputed facts in this record that counsel’s performance fell within the broad bounds of professional reasonableness or that any errors did not prejudice the proceeding. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
John Wells asked a variety of questions regarding attorney-client confidentiality in various hypothetical circumstances. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
The Judge is really rocking now, and we're only up to page 38. [read post]
