Search for: "In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm by Barry Barnett
In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig., No. 12-7085 (D.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 1:33 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Circuit recently affirmed the denial of class certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) class on the grounds that the proposed class contained uninjured class members in the case of In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, Dakota Granite Co, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:01 pm
The decision is In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,945. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:12 pm by Sean Wajert
Circuit relied on the precedent in In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation – MDL No. 1869, No. 12-7085, 2013 U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, No. 12-7085, 2013 U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:52 am by Sean Wajert
In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation at 252, citing Amchem Prods. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:23 am by Louis M. Solomon
  For example, in the direct purchaser component of In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL Docket No. 1869, Misc. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
Circuit colleagues vacated class certification in a high-profile antitrust case, In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig., 725 F.3d 244 (D.C. [read post]
Developments In the U.S., this settlement process and the crushing expense of class action litigation has resulted in two significant developments. 1. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm by Barry Barnett
For that proposition, they rely on In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, 552 F.3d 305, 311 (3d Cir. 2008), and In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, 725 F.3d 244, 252 (D.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am by Travis Hinman
Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013)), and evidence with nonsensical results, such as evidence showing injuries to class members who by definition are incapable of being injured (citing In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, 725 F.3d 244 (D.C. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
This week it decided another one: In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation. [read post]