Search for: "In re: September 11 Litigation" Results 61 - 80 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Similarly, the SEC and the other regulatory users of CAT have little incentive to be judicious in their use of CAT queries.[5] The SROs, which in the funding model before us today bear a third of the cost, do care about constraining costs.[6] They have pushed back on certain elements of the plan and are even litigating with us on some features of CAT. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:00 am
”Looks like they’re coming down hard on soft money ….# # #US DOJ PRESS RELEASE ~ 08.11.23 [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
Another recurring theme for the number of filings so far this year is the number of cryptocurrency-related lawsuits; there were 11 cryptocurrency and digital asset-related lawsuits during the first eight months of 2023, compared to 23 for the full year 2022. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Safeguards under the Investigatory Powers Act for journalistic material gathered in bulk by UK intelligence agencies will be re-examined in the High Court. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
The Commission has found that the public health and safety requires this notice to warn the public quickly of the hazard.The recall of the affected dehumidifiers was first announced in September 2013, updated in October 2013, expanded in January 2014, re-announced in May 2014, and re-announced again in November 2016. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
  Public and private efforts at capacity building is one route; so is funding litigation in the jurisdiction where the claim arose. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am by Erik W. Weibust
The HEROES Act was passed in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and permits the Secretary to “waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs under title IV of the [Education Act] as the Secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency. 20 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14L (“SLB 14L”),[8] issued in November 2021, reversed the staff’s views on paragraphs (i)(5)[9] and (i)(7),[10] which limit a company’s ability to exclude proposals if there are significant social policy issues.[11] While companies have not frequently sought to exclude proposals under paragraph (i)(5), paragraph (i)(7) was one of the most common bases for seeking exclusion.[12] SLB 14L reversed a position that had been in place for over… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm by Javier Dominguez
The case is In re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, case number 1:15-md-02599, in the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Bill Marler
See generally, Minister of Health September 3, 2018, Media Statement. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:23 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Therefore, X et al. should be prevented from bringing a new action, the purpose of which was the re-examination of what had already been decided (DSC, Appeal No. 419/2023 of 17 May 2023). [read post]