Search for: "In re: Tam"
Results 81 - 100
of 757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 3:10 am
"Scandalousness: The FUCT appeal (In re Brunetti), which challenges the constitutionality of the scandalousness provision of Section 2(a) is currently suspended at the CAFC. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
This lawsuit was brought by two qui tam whistleblowers, Craig Patrick and Charles Bates, under the False Claims Act. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
The court sua sponte dismissed plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim following the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:49 am
I’ll be speaking about In re Tam but don’t worry, there will be thrills and chills and stuff you won’t read on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® … for the foreseeable future. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:53 pm
See In re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation, 566 F.3d 956 (10th Cir. 2009); U.S. ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:36 pm
Background for the In re Tam case dates back to November 2011 when Simon Tam filed a trademark application to register the band’s name “The Slants” for “entertainment in the nature of live performance by a musical band. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:15 am
However, the re-worked public disclosure bar only has the effect of encouraging the disclosure of actual fraud, and still limits rewards to persons who are the first to make the government privy to the specific allegations. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 9:14 am
Maui County, 430 P.2d 321, 50 Hawai'i 51 (1967) to the Superferry case.Back in 1966, Eddie Tam,who had been re-elected to the Maui board of supervisors, died before the beginning of the term. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:37 am
If you’re following the excitement, you’ve already bookmarked and, presumably, shared with all your friends our initial Federal Circuit brief filed in support of the appeal from the PTO / TTAB’s refusal to register the trademark THE SLANTS to The Slants (in the person of their front man, Simon Tam). [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
Pursuant to the 2015 budget bill which requires annual re-indexing of False Claims Act penalties for inflation, the minimum per-claim penalty which rose last year from $5,500 to $10,781, increases to $10,957. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:37 am
The district court had dismissed the action under state law res judicata principals, because the relator had settled a defamation action brought in state court against her by the defendants. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 1:35 pm
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit held in In re Tam that a portion of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, prohibiting the registration of "disparaging" trademarks, violated the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm
On Friday, October 2nd, the CAFC heard oral argument en banc in in re Tam, the issue being whether "the bar on registration of disparaging marks in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, seeking Supreme Court review of the CAFC's decision in In re Tam 117 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:53 am
If you’re confirmed, will you pledge to vigorously enforce that act and devote adequate resources to investigating and prosecuting False Claims Act cases? [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 8:52 pm
This requirement precludes "qui tam suits based on information that would have been equally available to strangers to the fraud transaction had they chosen to look for it as it was to the relator. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:19 pm
I’m kind of tired of In re Tam also. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
If you’re thinking we couldn’t have just plucked that example out of thin air, you are correct. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
In re Simon Shiao Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
In re Simon Shiao Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. [read post]
