Search for: "In re: The Exxon Valdez."
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 6:57 am
Section 1004 of the Oil Pollution Act (OPA), passed into law in August 1990 after the Exxon Valdez incident, limits the liability of holders of leases or permits for offshore facilities to $75 million per spill, plus removal costs. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
We sent reporters to three Gulf states and called in Ross Anderson, who won the Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:41 pm
Berman represented plaintiffs in suits involving the Exxon Valdez oil spill and secured a $92 million settlement in securities litigation against Boeing. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:15 pm
The phrase “res ipa loquitur” (the thing speaks for itself) leaps to mind. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:21 am
Exxon Valdez Case Brings $2.5B Damages Fight to Supreme Court
The National Law Journal
The Exxon Valdez ran aground on an Alaskan reef nearly 20 years ago, but a related case has just reached the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am
" Now, we're still a little unsure whether Sen. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am
" Now, we're still a little unsure whether Sen. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:11 am
They're handing out cash like candy, and there's none of it for us. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
In Alaska, sea otters faced similar problems after the Exxon Valdez. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:59 am
Some have been at this job for more than 20 years, dating back to before the infamous Exxon Valdez spill of 1989.Like most scientists, they prefer to work quietly, leaving the press conferences and politics to state and local officials closer to the scene. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:24 am
It seems that JPMorgan had provided Exxon with a $4.8 billion credit line, but Exxon was now facing $5 billion in punitive damages as a result of the Valdez catastrophe, so JPMorgan was required to reserve the funds for such a credit risk. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 12:11 pm
(Oil spill photo by the EPA) What happens when a half a trillion dollar company creates an environmental disaster worse than the Exxon Valdez accident, leaving the soil in a Brooklyn neighborhood seeped with between four and twenty feet of cancer-causing, benzene-concentrated oil? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm
They're all like this, these catastrophes. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
"With the opening of shrimping season and near-daily re-opening of fishing areas, seafood safety is a major issue right now," said Gina Solomon, a senior scientist with NRDC. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:12 pm
The Deepwater Horizon disaster has now surpassed the Exxon-Valdez oil spill, to become the single largest oil spill in the U.S. history. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm
They're all like this, these catastrophes. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
"BP still hasn't 'made it right,' and its claims that 'the commercial fishing industry is recovering' is a self-serving PR statement that defies quantification and can in no way be validated at this time," says Ed Cake, an expert in the Gulf's marine environment from DIberville, MS.Cake, who works for the Gulf oyster industry, notes that Alaska's Price William Sound herring fishery is only now recovering, 22 years after the Exxon Valdez… [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:13 pm
In an April 29 letter to President Obama, Florida Democratic Senator Bill Nelson said, ". . .if the spill continues for a month it may be nearly as large as the Exxon Valdez. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
"I would be stunned if all the criminal and civil cases against BP are wrapped up before the end of this decade," said David Logan, dean of Roger Williams University's School of Law in Rhode Island.BP may be able to stretch out payments even longer, if the Exxon Valdez spill is any measure. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
The construct was reinforced by understandable media emphasis on large awards and further fueled by experimental research, never reconciled with realworld data (Eisenberg et al. 2002), funded by ExxonMobil Corporation (Sunstein et al. 2002) to mitigate Exxon's liability related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. [read post]
