Search for: "In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State" Results 161 - 180 of 832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
Litigation: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia will hear cross motions to dismiss / summary judgment in National Restaurant Association [NRA] v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm by Justin Levitt
First, the numbers. 428 congressional districts, in 43 states, must be redrawn (seven states have one Representative apiece); 7,382 state legislative districts (and hundreds of thousands of local districts) must also be adjusted. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”The district court denied preliminary injunctive relief, finding that the challenged aspects were inherently misleading commercial speech and thus unprotected. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:29 pm by Steve Hall
In January 2012, hearings are scheduled in Cumberland County to address these issues. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 1:34 am by admin
  A quick civics lesson: The District of Columbia is a federal district, and not a state. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:00 pm by Dan Bushell
Last week's decision unquestionably brought closure to the redistricting process, and the initial challenges to the 2012 legislative redistricting (with the Court even prohibiting motions for rehearing). [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am by Venkat
The court points to the fact that the state’s own assessment process classified a chunk of the offenders as having a “low to moderate” risk of re-offending. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:37 pm by Steve Hall
On Thursday, the bill cleared its first legislative hearing, and if passed in the Senate, voters may be able to decide the issue in the November 2012 elections. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am by Ron Coleman
District of Columbia: The District took a very different approach, asserting that to deny it registration for its seal would violate the obligations of the United States under the Paris Convention. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
On November 7, 2011, a criminal complaint was filed against Patrick Ricciardi in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
District Court for the District of Columbia that the information sought by the committee “is relevant only to serve the Select Committee’s stated purpose of engaging in ad-hoc law enforcement and its unstated purpose of antagonizing its political adversaries. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:07 am by Joe Kristan
  It helps to have a legislator who wants to bring pork to his district: “It’s all about partnerships and it’s all about collaborations,” said Sen. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am by MBettman
In Re CP, 2012-Ohio-1446,  (automatic mandatory lifelong sex-offender classifications for certain juvenile sex offenders violate due process.) [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by req@quintilone.com
  The Second Appellate District used both Federal and California State case law to justify retroactivity of Labor Code § 226(e)(2)(B) by stating that “[a]n amendment which merely clarifies existing law may be given retroactive effect even without an express Legislative intent for retroactivity. [read post]