Search for: "In re 232511 Investments, Ltd." Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 4:15 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonMontgomery v. 232511 Investments, Ltd., 2012 VT 31 (mem.).If you practice land use law in Vermont the phrase Stowe Club Highlands acts like a CIA sleeper agent’s trigger and will cause you to automatically rattle off the three conditions that allow you to alter an existing permit (unanticipated change in law or fact, unanticipated change in conditions, or changes in technology). [read post]