Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 2(b)(2)" Results 41 - 60 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
(Trump admin to let Americans sue some foreign firms doing business in Cuba).These actions are made possible because of two significant changes. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm by SW
If the resident deems their property and situation unsafe, we would advise they contact any local authority of their choice for immediate temporary re-housing. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
That is not to find that a Court would have made mandatory orders against the Defendant during that period. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:12 pm by Laura Orr
If you’re not tantalized then I recommend you select another legal specialty, e.g. uh, hmmm, er ... honestly now. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:18 pm
" t.co/6aA5cnm 5th affirms break-up fee per §363(b) stds-not §503(b)-where order was issued before bidders incurred due dilig. fees. t.co/6aA5cnm Topics of General Interest Good 11 yr old Texas Monthly profile re "It's Rick Perry's Party Now" A profile of the latest GOP pres. candidate. t.co/uLTEQx7 Parsing the latest blow to Obama's health care law http://t.co/dL32MmD by @CBSAndrew RT @Nouriel: RT… [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:46 am
Both (2) and (3) take a cloning approach to dealing with the effect of EUTMs post Brexit. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There was no complex statutory language you could turn to in order to make the choice b/t competing paradigms. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Three paths: (1) §13(b) 2d proviso, in federal court for whole case; (2) § 13(b) first proviso—uncommon—in fed court for preliminary injunction, in front of ALJ for remainder (might be more attractive with reforms that are speeding up ALJ proceedings); (3) Part III: in front of an ALJ. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:12 pm by Tessa Shepperson
  You will probably be ordered to pay costs (if the order is made), but this will be fixed costs and is unlikely to be more than about £300 – so it will probably be more cost effective than moving out into B&B. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by Kurt J. Schafers
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Analogous case law on these types of challenges suggests both that (a) there are no time limits on challenges to the validity of debt, and (b) if held invalid, the principal amount of the debt is simply not subject to recovery. [read post]
8 May 2011, 9:22 pm
Eng. distinguished. http://ow.ly/4PY4G 3d Dissent: Party in Interest standing obtained by alleging fear of less projected profit from future business dealings. http://ow.ly/4PY4G D-NV: Notice of appeal doesn't divest the Bankruptcy Court of jurisdiction to enter an order appointing a ch. 11 trustee. http://ow.ly/4PY3y BK-MA reviews circuit split re whether a secured creditor is entitled to the credit agreement's default rate of interest.… [read post]