Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 2(b)(2)"
Results 81 - 100
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
High Court Decision The Barclay brothers responded by bringing a case to the High Court of England and Wales.[2] They sought an order quashing the Privy Council’s approval of the 2010 law and seeking reasons in respect of that approval and the dismissal of the petition. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
§ 282(b)(2)) Eligibility Challenges: Hemopet v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
” And Mr Rutledge contends that the rationale for placing the statutorily homeless in the lowest band (unless they satisfy the residence qualification) is that they enjoy certain advantages over those applying for re-housing from elsewhere. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
"We're working to create an environment where we're job-friendly" Gov. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
I plan to post these case development summaries in the coming weeks and then reprint them here so they're all collected in one handy place. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Richard Murphy, Administrative Law and Practice, 2 ADMIN. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
§ 1441(b)(2), which is currently under consideration in the matter referenced here. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 10:59 am
RE debtor near foreclosure given 2d chance on tight leash shortly after BK-TX dismissal for bad faith filing. http://t.co/BlYiNms 2d Cir: Madoff ancillary litigation - Banks generally owe no duty to protect one customer from another customer's fraud. http://t.co/xc9tKdN 2d Cir: Madoff litigation-Exception to bank exculpation if cust has trust funds in fiduc acct w/clear evid of misapprop. http://t.co/xc9tKdN BK-DE: Insuff. record to decide if publication notice in WSJ… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:25 pm
Mayer Brown but for unprof. conduct in depo. http://t.co/P5jWWsT B-NJ denies postconfirm trustee mot. to disgorge fees of admin. insolv. estate bec consent order award was final award. http://t.co/PDRHRKE D-CA affirms BK Ct's expunging of class claim for unpaid wages against Ch 13 owners of parking lots. http://t.co/mnAfii7 D-CA reviews lack of policy factors supporting class claims in BK, incl. ease of filing claims & efficiency of process.… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:00 pm
b. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PRESTIGE-BK-ND-FL-KILLIAN-9-13-2011.pdf … D-DE: Admin. claim for breach of an assumed contract should be allowed only to extent assumed lease benefitted estate. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/JUVENNELLIANO-BK-D-DEL-SHANNON-9-7-2011.pdf D-MD dismisses implied covenant of good faith & fair deali [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
As 2022 gets under way, the legal eagles of FOIA Advisor -- Allan Blutstein (AB) and Ryan Mulvey (RM) -- look back at 2021 and identify the decisions that stood out to them (in no particular order).(1) U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
Meunier, Trevor B. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Further, the decision in R (on the application of S) v YP School (2003) EWCA Civ 1306, (2004) ELR 37 that the appropriate standard in deciding to uphold an exclusion was the criminal one was not robust authority in relation to the requirements of Article 6, and was also inconsistent with House of Lords authority, R(S), B (Children) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), Re (2008) UKHL 35, (2009) 1 AC 11, and D, Re (2008) UKHL 33, (2008) 1 WLR 1499. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:58 pm
See In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 655 (7th Cir. 2003). [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
No change in general principles of statutory construction or admin law. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119, 123 (2d Cir. 1930) (Hand, J.). [2] In re Trasylol Prods. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am
Mr I sought an interim injunction for re-admittance and preventing any further eviction attempt. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The SCA generally prohibits disclosure to federal or state governments of certain email messages and metadata, but this prohibition yields to U.S. court orders that meet the following criteria: “A court order for disclosure . . . shall issue only if the governmental entity [seeking the order] offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the contents of a wire or electronic communication, or the records… [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
K-12 and disciplinary distinctions don’t make sense b/c we’re talking about educating students. [read post]
