Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 8"
Results 41 - 60
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But irrespective of the context, if you’re speaking on AI, you too must ensure that you do so in a manner that is not materially false or misleading. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
On receipt of this additional information, the Acting Chancellor[**] set aside the original order in so far as the objector was not deemed to have a “sufficient interest” in the petition, Re St. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
The CAF assessment was neither well informed on the housing position nor well considered, but did conclude (to housing dept) “may your department possibly re-open the housing application in respect of [J]. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
In such a case the court's obligation under article 8(2), to consider the proportionality of making the order sought, does represent a potential new obstacle to the making of an order for possession. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
In such a case the court's obligation under article 8(2), to consider the proportionality of making the order sought, does represent a potential new obstacle to the making of an order for possession. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:02 am
See In re Desano, Initial Decisions Release No. 412 (admin proc. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
About two months later (within the 56 day period), Islington sent a letter headed RE: Notification of Decision – Part VII of the Housing Act 1996, which set out Islington’s reasons for finding that Mr M was not in priority need and which concluded: “13. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
In re Jam. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Lawmaker Hid One Key Fact as He Fought Checks on Gun Shops DNyuz – Glen Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 8/25/2023 Rep. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
File No. 3-14009, 8/18/10). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 1:00 pm
We're asking for cookies. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
Code § 11-8-8-17). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.146(g)(2)(C);8 ? [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:30 pm
The chart of What Stocks Typically Do After a 20% Correction is the "Money Game Chart of the Day" for 8/18/11 from a post entitled What Happens to Stocks If Profits Don't Collapse? [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 7:47 am
Rev. 157 (2021). 8. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Beyond the expected--a renewed commitment to traditional alliances, a re-commitment to the denuclearization of Korea, and a reaffirmation of support for Taiwanese autonomy--the Act authorized renewed bilateral and multilateral engagement with US partners. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 6:10 am
If you’re a software developer or an IT admin, you definitely need to know about this. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm
The 8 circuit court cases involve fraud. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) October 3, 2011 Mr Justice Silber in High Court: Refusal to amend 5 aspects of control order was lawful. [read post]
