Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 8"
Results 41 - 60
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2018] EWHC 2368 (Admin) [3] Op.cit ftn.1 at para 9. [4] By contrast, the Court pointed to express provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (re torture overseas), the Sexual Offences Act 2003, and the Bribery Act 2010; “The more exorbitant the jurisdiction, the more is likely to be required of the statutory provisions in order to rebut the presumption against extra-territorial effect. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
About two months later (within the 56 day period), Islington sent a letter headed RE: Notification of Decision – Part VII of the Housing Act 1996, which set out Islington’s reasons for finding that Mr M was not in priority need and which concluded: “13. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
P. 8019(b)(3). 1 Tagnetics appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s October 25, 2019 “Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters” (the “October 25 Order”). [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:41 am
Connect People We are currently a team of 8, in order of appearance: Hilary, Janice, Marnie, Jessica, Danielle, Deidre and Amanda. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 1:26 am
It’s vital the Government re-aligns LHA rates with current market rents, in order to ensure vulnerable tenants continue to be able to access properties in the private rented sector. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
”[8] However, a stricter corollary of the plain meaning rule applies to statutory definitions: “When a statute includes an explicit definition, we must follow that definition, even if it varies from the term’s ordinary meaning. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:27 am
S. 218 (1994);Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 Admin. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
The judge rejected the appellants’ challenge to the validity of this order. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 1:00 pm
We're asking for cookies. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Federal district court issue opinion orders, but their stateside counterparts rarely do so, at least not in Texas. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued October 31,… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
FEE-SHIFTING BY BENCH AND BAR IN TEXAS HENCEFORTH TO BE GUIDED BY THE LODESTAR Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
(Trump admin to let Americans sue some foreign firms doing business in Cuba).These actions are made possible because of two significant changes. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm
The rational landlord will seek to avoid the situation and therefore anything that interrupts prompt re-letting will be avoided if possible. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
It gave McIntyre a life-long interest in the subject in general and a particular fondness for Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.[7] Given this deep affinity between philosophy and law, one might expect to see explicit references to the major philosophers in the decisions written by judges.[8] This study discusses the extent to which this is true. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Beyond the expected--a renewed commitment to traditional alliances, a re-commitment to the denuclearization of Korea, and a reaffirmation of support for Taiwanese autonomy--the Act authorized renewed bilateral and multilateral engagement with US partners. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:46 am
I honestly can’t think of a useful initialism: I’ll just call them clones.Clones will share the filing (including priority and seniority) and registration dates of their parent EUTM (1(8), 12, 13, 14). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 2:12 pm
It was generally accepted that Article 8 was engaged. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
Nicklin J stated that “the authorities identify the correct test whenever Article 10 and Article 8 interests conflict as that in In re S (A Child) [17] and the test to be applied at the interim stage as that provided by s.12 Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
Following Morris v The London Borough of Newham (2002) EWHC 1262 (Admin) and R (Bernard) v Enfield London Borough Council (2002) EWHC 2282 Admin, it was possible for Article 8 rights to be infringed by a failure to fulfil HA 1996 Part VII duties. [read post]
