Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 8" Results 101 - 120 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 12:46 am
I honestly can’t think of a useful initialism: I’ll just call them clones.Clones will share the filing (including priority and seniority) and registration dates of their parent EUTM (1(8), 12, 13, 14). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
At the minimum, a re-proposal could have resulted in a better estimate of the costs and benefits associated with this rulemaking. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr AA brought then issued various applications in various courts, from 25 April 2013 on, mostly for re-entry and/or access to his belongings. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:04 am by Rob Robinson
Annual Discovery & E-Discovery Conference (Law Bulletin Seminars) June 8, 2011 Chicago, IL Click here for more inf [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Art. 8 of Paris Convention requires protection for trade names without registration. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Federal district court issue opinion orders, but their stateside counterparts rarely do so, at least not in Texas. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm by Marie Louise
Flagstar Bancorp (Patently-O) CAFC reverses rejections in reexamination of 7 of 8 NTP patents: In re NTP (WHDA) (Patents Post-Grant) ITC: ALJ Gildea grants-in-part respondent, Canon’s, motion for summary determination of invalidity in Certain Motion-Sensitive Sound Effects Devices and Image Display Devices (337-TA-773) (ITC Law Blog) ITC reviews and vacates ALJ Luckern summary determination ruling on domestic industry in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am by Sam Gustin
” GadElKareem quickly re-opened his website at torrent-finder.info. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  No change in general principles of statutory construction or admin law. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Yet, as Chancellor Strine suggests (slip op. at Page 8-10 below) the answer to these difficult questions may be avoided entirely if the legislative will  is understood merely as a default position from which the parties may contract around to suit their interests (subject of course to their relative bargaining power). [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am by Holly Brezee
§ 1447, particularly subsection (c). [8] Three circuits appear to hold this position. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm by Holly Brezee
§ 1447, particularly subsection (c). [8] Three circuits appear to hold this position. [read post]