Search for: "In re Adoption of A.H." Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
However, the more we've thought about it, the more we're convinced that the proper response to this (we fervently hope) aberration has to be more than just self-righteous criticism.In one way or another, we've helped convince supreme courts in six states either to adopt or to reaffirm the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
Palmer's version of the facts is absurdly stupid, and why the defense lawyer (smartly) adopted the strategy she did. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
  As we discussed in our “What’s Up With the Third Restatement” post, the Texas Supreme Court was an early adopter of the Third Restatement generally. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
They're conservative down there, right? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]