Search for: "In re Adoption of M.P." Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
BBC News reports that the U.K. government will adopt an open source software action plan. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm by PaulKostro
” In re the Adoption of Child by W.P. and M.P., 163 N.J. 158, 169 (2000). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:20 am by Vikram Raghavan
As he points out, Article 20(3) incorporates a guarantee against testimonial compulsion (M.P. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:55 am
The Court: It was not necessary for the appellant (Sidhu) to have resigned from the membership of the Parliament as he could in law continue as M.P. by merely filing an appeal within a period of 3 months and had he adopted such a course he could have easily avoided incurring any disqualification at least till the decision of the appeal. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Separately, and I think the government was well intentioned here that they tried to bring in terms of use that would hopefully make it clear that people could re-use content and that was supposed to be adopted across all government websites that at least for the departments th [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:56 am by Vikram Raghavan
S and the reasoning adopted by the Court of Appeal is of particular interest. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
CMEC is to be commended for bringing about a better understanding of fair dealing in the context of education and the Board is to be commended for adopting what were presumably many of CMEC’s arguments.The Board seems to have finally refused to include works of non-affiliated rights owners – which AC had tried to include by sending out cheques to sometimes bewildered recipients whose names somehow appeared in AC’s database and received a small cheque out of the blue (para… [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
 We are of the opinion that the above three decisions require to be re-considered as, in our opinion, something which cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. [read post]